Back to Testing & Quality Assurance

Test Cases Generator

qatestingdocumentationrequirementsworkflow
⭐ 2.7kπŸ“„ AGPL-3.0πŸ•’ 2026-05-04Source β†—

Install this skill

npx skills add cexll/myclaude

Works across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot & Antigravity

The Test Cases Generator tool transforms product requirements into structured, actionable quality assurance documentation. It targets developers and QA engineers who need to bridge the gap between initial product requirements and rigorous validation. By systematically breaking down user requirements, the tool produces a set of test scenarios that encompass functional flows, boundary conditions, failure modes, and state transitions. It ensures that every requirement is tied to specific, verifiable test steps, reducing ambiguity in the testing process. Instead of manually drafting lists, users obtain a standardized markdown output that includes priority levels and requirement traceability. This tool maintains high test quality by enforcing a requirement-driven approach rather than focusing on implementation specifics, ensuring that developers build features that align exactly with the defined acceptance criteria.
By cexll

What this skill does

  • β€’Maps functional requirements to specific test scenarios
  • β€’Generates structured markdown test documentation
  • β€’Categorizes tests into functional, edge, error, and state transition groups
  • β€’Assigns priority levels to test cases
  • β€’Tracks requirement coverage with a summary matrix

When to use it

  • βœ“When you have a finished PRD and need to plan your test suite
  • βœ“When you need to define explicit acceptance criteria for a new feature
  • βœ“When you want to identify missing test coverage for an existing module
  • βœ“When you are preparing documentation for external QA validation

When not to use it

  • βœ•When you need to perform actual automated code execution
  • βœ•When you are writing unit tests for low-level functions instead of feature-level scenarios

How to invoke it

Example prompts that trigger this skill:

  • β€œGenerate test cases for the login flow defined in my PRD.”
  • β€œCreate a test plan based on these user requirements.”
  • β€œCan you outline the QA scenarios for this new API integration?”
  • β€œGenerate test cases focusing on edge cases for the payment checkout.”
  • β€œReview my requirements document and provide a full test coverage report.”

Example workflow

  1. Provide the source PRD or requirement text to the agent.
  2. The agent identifies core user flows and edge cases.
  3. The agent asks clarifying questions regarding state transitions or specific platform limits.
  4. The agent generates a structured markdown document containing functional and error tests.
  5. Review the coverage matrix to ensure all requirements are addressed.

Prerequisites

  • –Access to a PRD document or clearly defined requirement list

Pitfalls & limitations

  • !Over-reliance on the agent without verifying the generated steps
  • !Ambiguous input requirements will result in generic or incomplete test cases
  • !State transition tests require explicit state definitions to be accurate

FAQ

Does this tool write actual code tests?
No, it generates descriptive documentation and test plans in markdown format for QA engineers to follow.
How does it handle state-based features?
The tool specifically looks for state transition scenarios if your requirements describe changing system states, such as order processing.
Can I link tests back to my PRD?
Yes, the generated output includes a traceability matrix that maps your requirements directly to the created test cases.

How it compares

Unlike a generic prompt, this tool follows a rigid, industry-standard structural template that enforces requirement-to-test mapping and ensures critical edge cases are never overlooked.

Source & trust

⭐ 2.7k starsπŸ“„ AGPL-3.0πŸ•’ Updated 2026-05-04πŸ›‘ reads-credentials

From the source: β€œ# Test Cases Generator This skill generates comprehensive, requirement-driven test cases from PRD documents or user requirements. ## Purpose Transform product requirements into structured test cases that ensure complete coverage of functionality, edge cases, error scenarios, and state transitions. T…”

View the full SKILL.md source

# Test Cases Generator

This skill generates comprehensive, requirement-driven test cases from PRD documents or user requirements.

## Purpose

Transform product requirements into structured test cases that ensure complete coverage of functionality, edge cases, error scenarios, and state transitions. The skill follows a pragmatic testing philosophy: test what matters, ensure every requirement has corresponding test coverage, and maintain test quality over quantity.

## When to Use

Trigger this skill when:
- User provides a PRD or requirements document and requests test cases
- User asks to "generate test cases", "create test scenarios", or "plan QA"
- User mentions testing coverage for a feature or requirement
- User needs structured test documentation in markdown format

## Core Testing Principles

Follow these principles when generating test cases:

1. **Requirement-driven, not implementation-driven** - Test cases must map directly to requirements, not implementation details
2. **Complete coverage** - Every requirement must have at least one test case covering:
   - Happy path (normal use cases)
   - Edge cases (boundary values, empty inputs, max limits)
   - Error handling (invalid inputs, failure scenarios, permission errors)
   - State transitions (if stateful, cover all valid state changes)
3. **Clear and actionable** - Each test case must be executable by a QA engineer without ambiguity
4. **Traceable** - Maintain clear mapping between requirements and test cases

## Workflow

### Step 1: Gather Requirements

First, identify the source of requirements:

1. If user provides a file path to a PRD, read it using the Read tool
2. If user describes requirements verbally, capture them
3. If requirements are unclear or incomplete, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:
   - What are the core user flows?
   - What are the acceptance criteria?
   - What are the edge cases or error scenarios to consider?
   - Are there any state transitions or workflows?
   - What platforms or environments need testing?

### Step 2: Extract Test Scenarios

Analyze requirements and extract test scenarios:

1. **Functional scenarios** - Normal use cases from requirements
2. **Edge case scenarios** - Boundary conditions, empty states, maximum limits
3. **Error scenarios** - Invalid inputs, permission failures, network errors
4. **State transition scenarios** - If the feature involves state, map all transitions

For each requirement, identify:
- Preconditions (what must be true before testing)
- Test steps (actions to perform)
- Expected results (what should happen)
- Postconditions (state after test completes)

### Step 3: Structure Test Cases

Organize test cases using this structure:

```markdown
# Test Cases: [Feature Name]

## Overview
- **Feature**: [Feature name]
- **Requirements Source**: [PRD file path or description]
- **Test Coverage**: [Summary of what's covered]
- **Last Updated**: [Date]

## Test Case Categories

### 1. Functional Tests
Test cases covering normal user flows and core functionality.

#### TC-F-001: [Test Case Title]
- **Requirement**: [Link to specific requirement]
- **Priority**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Preconditions**:
  - [Condition 1]
  - [Condition 2]
- **Test Steps**:
  1. [Step 1]
  2. [Step 2]
  3. [Step 3]
- **Expected Results**:
  - [Expected result 1]
  - [Expected result 2]
- **Postconditions**: [State after test]

### 2. Edge Case Tests
Test cases covering boundary conditions and unusual inputs.

#### TC-E-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]

### 3. Error Handling Tests
Test cases covering error scenarios and failure modes.

#### TC-ERR-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]

### 4. State Transition Tests
Test cases covering state changes and workflows (if applicable).

#### TC-ST-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]

## Test Coverage Matrix

| Requirement ID | Test Cases | Coverage Status |
|---------------|------------|-----------------|
| REQ-001 | TC-F-001, TC-E-001 | βœ“ Complete |
| REQ-002 | TC-F-002 | ⚠ Partial |

## Notes
- [Any additional testing considerations]
- [Known limitations or assumptions]
```

### Step 4: Generate Test Cases

For each identified scenario, create a detailed test case following the structure above. Ensure:

1. **Unique IDs** - Use prefixes: TC-F (functional), TC-E (edge), TC-ERR (error), TC-ST (state)
2. **Clear titles** - Descriptive titles that explain what's being tested
3. **Requirement traceability** - Link each test case to specific requirements
4. **Priority assignment** - Mark critical paths as High priority
5. **Executable steps** - Steps must be clear enough for any QA engineer to execute
6. **Measurable results** - Expected results must be verifiable

### Step 5: Validate Coverage

Before finalizing, verify:

1. Every requirement has at least one test case
2. Happy path is covered for all user flows
3. Edge cases are identified for boundary conditions
4. Error scenarios are covered for failure modes
5. State transitions are tested if feature is stateful

If coverage gaps exist, generate additional test cases.

### Step 6: Output Test Cases

Write the test cases to `tests/<name>-test-cases.md` where `<name>` is derived from:
- The feature name from the PRD
- The user's specified name
- A sanitized version of the requirement title

Use the Write tool to create the file with the structured test cases.

### Step 7: Summary

After generating test cases, provide a brief summary in Chinese:
- Total number of test cases generated
- Coverage breakdown (functional, edge, error, state)
- Any assumptions made or areas needing clarification
- File path where test cases were saved

## Quality Checklist

Before finalizing test cases, verify:

- [ ] Every requirement has corresponding test cases
- [ ] Happy path scenarios are covered
- [ ] Edge cases include boundary values, empty inputs, max limits
- [ ] Error handling covers invalid inputs and failure scenarios
- [ ] State transitions are tested if applicable
- [ ] Test case IDs are unique and follow naming convention
- [ ] Test steps are clear and executable
- [ ] Expected results are measurable and verifiable
- [ ] Coverage matrix shows complete coverage
- [ ] File is written to tests/<name>-test-cases.md

## Example Usage

**User**: "Generate test cases for the user authentication feature in docs/auth-prd.md"

**Process**:
1. Read docs/auth-prd.md
2. Extract requirements: login, logout, password reset, session management
3. Identify scenarios: successful login, invalid credentials, expired session, etc.
4. Generate test cases covering all scenarios
5. Write to tests/auth-test-cases.md
6. Summarize coverage in Chinese

## References

For detailed testing methodologies and best practices, see:
- `references/testing-principles.md` - Core testing principles and patterns

Quoted from cexll/myclaude for reference β€” see the original for the authoritative, latest version.

How to Use This Skill Unit

Option A: Project-Specific (Recommended)

  1. Click "Download" above
  2. In your project, create the directory: .agent/skills/test-cases/
  3. Save the file as SKILL.md
  4. The agent will automatically discover the skill based on its description.

Option B: Global Installation (All Agents)

Save the file to these locations to make it available across all projects:

  • Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/cexll/myclaude/test-cases/SKILL.md
  • Cursor: ~/.cursor/skills/cexll/myclaude/test-cases/SKILL.md
  • Antigravity: ~/.gemini/antigravity/skills/cexll/myclaude/test-cases/SKILL.md

πŸš€ Install with CLI:
npx skills add cexll/myclaude

Read the Master Guide: Mastering Agent Skills β†’

Recommended Rules

View more rules β†’

Recommended Workflows

View more workflows β†’

Recommended MCP Servers

View more MCP servers β†’

Take It Further

Maximize your productivity with these powerful resources

πŸ“‹

Define Your Standards

Set up coding standards to ensure this workflow produces consistent, high-quality results.

Browse Rules Library
πŸ“–

Master Workflows

Learn how to create custom workflows, use Turbo Mode, and build your automation library.

Complete Guide

How to use this Skill in Claude Code & Cursor

For Claude Code (CLI)

To use this skill in Claude Code, copy the rule content into your project's custom instructions or follow our Add-Skill CLI guide. This ensures Claude follows your standards during every code generation.

For Cursor & Windsurf

For Cursor or Windsurf, individual skills are best used in the "Rules for AI" section. This specific unit helps the agent avoid testing & quality assurance issues, leading to cleaner, more efficient code.

Why the skill format matters: the standardized Agent Skills format lets your AI agent load detailed instructions only when they are relevant, keeping your prompt clean while improving results.

Source & attribution

This skill is categorized under Testing & Quality Assurance and is published by cexll, maintained in cexll/myclaude.

← Browse All Agent Skills
Sponsored AI assistant. Recommendations may be paid.